Skip to main content
TrustRadius
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

Overview

What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

23 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is iRise?

iRise offers a prototyping and design platform for software development.

What is PractiTest?

PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution…

Return to navigation

Product Demos

Using IBM Rational Team Concert and IBM Rational Rhapsody for Android development

YouTube

How to integrate JIRA with IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC)

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Competitors

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.

Rally Software are common alternatives for IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 5.

The most common users of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(57)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-9 of 9)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Steffen Jäschke | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
ResellerIncentivized
IBM Rational DOORS is designed to match paradigms of requirements engineering that matched the state-of-art up to lately 2011. It is still at the top of the list since many engineers have been educated with the paradigms in mind. But as can be already drawn from the name there is a mismatch in concepts that have developed bigger since. This is a package from the broader IBM Rational software suit. This emphasizes the Rational Dynamic Object Oriented Requirements System that has been extended by the DOORS eXtension Language (DLX). In the selling logic of IBM, it is superseded by IBM Jazz. For many of my customers, it is a hybrid between knowledge management and lifecycle management. It is important that it is bound against several trusted and approved engineering databases. These are sources of unmatched quality still despite contradicting facts. It is still under development and is supported by the IBM expert team. At IBM the product name is now Engineering Requirements Management DOORS. The product is cross-platform. Clients are Windows, servers are Unix. That has advantages and causes problems. The new focus in the development of the product is to be tech-savvy, enhance simplicity and overview, and grow clarity.
  • Open Services supporting Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC).
  • Required definition management and managed capabilities enabling.
  • Rational DOORS Web Access for local on the test field presence.
  • On-sites established reporting system.
  • Approved linking requirements to test plans
  • Engineering Requirements Management DOORS traces requirements thereby eliminates manually processes and spreadsheets, for improved productivity.
  • Returns the investment efficiently.
  • It is hard to conserve the achieved qualities for the experienced customers under futher technological changes.
  • The growing diverge of the product lines causes worries about the appropriateness of the software package for futures requirements policy package in software development.
  • Windows is seemingly not the best platform choice for the future. Security issues pertain and new come to the problem atop.
  • It seems more probable the IBM favors Jazz to Engineering Requirements Management DOORS due to advantages in the development process and the technologies reused from the infrastructures on which the servers will be run.
  • The advantage the Engineering Requirements Management DOORS is well established at the customers will be melted in the sun very soon and Jazz will be favored by the customers too.
  • The recognized databases will be updated to newer software platforms making a difference in manageable size and depth of knowledge at the same broadness.
  • The size of the software is already a problem for present day installations. There is no or little space to grow further. New splits and adopted packages are unavoidable.
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS former IBM Rational DOORS profits very much from the mighty market position it had till today. It had been the most favored requirement engineering tools suite with the highest investments in the infrastructure concerning hardware, software, and knowledge sources. It was embedded in knowledge sources of test stands, hardware labs, and knowledge database servers. It allowed for some of the highest profit changes and made the fame with it. But the paradigms of requirements engineering change. If not were superseded by completely different approaches for the target solution worlds. The foremost position in the selling tables is unstable if changes are not solved or coped with by the strategist at IBM and their customers. Since the highly successful alternative suits are already at the market, and some are from IBM already the lifecycle for IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS is at the later highs. But the suite is still at the very top and very popular. There are still many problems unsolved and many wishes at the customers to make the use more comfortable and efficient at the overall level. If the time of setting up the software package is passed the adoption get more extended and complicated. There is a lot of work at the stage around and the expertise will be required for a long time from now.
Andrea McConnell | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
On my end, I mainly rely on IBM Rational Team Concert to collaborate with colleagues on projects. It has been easy to get notified when there is an amendment on development lifecycle.
  • IBM Rational Team Concert makes it easy to follow business processes.
  • Track and coordinate tasks which ease change management procedures.
  • Integrate with external applications and APIs.
  • Visualize data to streamline reporting.
  • No free trial and freemium version.
IBM Rational Team Concert is a reliable project management solution that suit our day-to-day business processes. It makes it effective to enhance data-centric decisions by visualizing data in real-time.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
As a business analyst, it is great to have such a comprehensive tool at our disposal. During requirement gathering, planning, documenting, and implementation phases of the project this tool really helped us a lot. It was so easy to do so many multiple tasks at ease with the help of this tool such as defining processes itself was so effective.
  • Requirement management and process definition.
  • Tracking of different artifacts within project such as defects and tickets.
  • Tracking code updates via automation.
  • Training and how to do guide can be improved to help new users.
  • Performance can be improved as there are times when it feels too slow to respond.
  • More API integration can help a lot.
While working on a complex project it is important all the needed change requests are handled in an effective manner, this tool helps us do exactly the same, it had great features to manage those change management tickets, making sure to merge the change with existing workflow, prioritize the requests centrally so there are no duplicates. Easy to collaborate across different teams and colleagues across the aisle.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
IBM Rational Team Concert is a collaborative software development, process configuration, planning, software configuration, reporting etc. The main problem the software solves is making projects more accessible and sharable. It's very useful especially for engineers.
  • No set-up fee
  • Range of functionalities
  • No free trial
In that case where your company needs to configure a process, this tool will be useful. You will be able to design and program processes, as well as track and coordinate tasks. The tracking aspect is also very helpful as it enables to use data in order to identify potential issues.
Amr Saad | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
My Department "Quality Department" uses IBM Rational Quality Manager as the main system that holds everything related to Quality like Test Cases, Test Plans, Test Suites, Execution Records, etc. The Application has a lot of features and helped us keep track of all testing activities conducted through different projects across the organization. We keep all of our testing artifacts on it as well.
  • Test Cases Management
  • Test Execution Management
  • Seamless Integration with IBM RTC and IBM RM
  • User Interface and User Experience needs to be Improved
  • No Defect Management
  • Integration with Automated Scripts needs to be easier
  • Some features depend on IBM RTC
IBM Rational Quality Manager is well suited to be used by the Quality Team in any Software Project. The Application provides good features to track Test Cases and Test Execution Results. On the other hand, the Application suffers from a very Old User Interface and a Very Bad overall User Experience. You have to go through very long and complicated steps to something which is not intuitive at all. Also, some features depend on having IBM RTC integrated with it.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently use DOORS to manage the project requirements for one or more projects. We use the software in one department for one or two lines of service that the company offers. DOORS allows us to manage a vast amount of data with relative ease. Although the program is very powerful, it is sometimes difficult to use.
  • Allows linking of information in different parts of the program.
  • Works fairly well with other programs like Excel and Word.
  • Has a layout that is familiar, with a ribbon-like bar at the top.
  • The program can seem overwhelming because it is very complex. Maybe a beginner, intermediate and advanced mode?
  • The software has some dependencies on other software that make it easy to break at times.
  • Setting up the software was a nightmare. It has too many components, and once the connection between them is set you cannot make changes easily.
DOORS is a very specific piece of software. It is suited to managing contract/project requirements. It works well to list and connect a lot of data, and then gives you the opportunity to show these relationships in several different ways, both graphical and in reports. The software is costly, so your project needs to be large enough to support it.
March 27, 2018

RTC Review

Puja Doshi | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It is being used by Digital Channel Technology team to manage all high-level business requirements in a centralized repository.
  • Clean GUI
  • User Friendly
  • Intuitive
  • No sorting functionality
  • No Filter Functionality
  • Difficult to manage when there are several projects on it

Well Suited: Small projects, Fewer users

Less Suited: Too many projects with a large number of business requirements

Giovanni Scioti | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Rational Doors Next Generation (DNG) has been used by the application division of my customer company, and specifically by several functional analysts. The tool appears to have really specific features that allow managing artifacts like embedded documents and stores them in a central repository, and then is able to track with a strict connection the work items and codes. It shows to be a not really easy tool to use. Surely it can give really good benefits enabling the business requirements of the CR and coding activity, but to provide a consistent connection you must always work on the embedded artifact and this scenario is really not so user-friendly.

Plus if you decide to extract the artifact in a Word document after you have modified it, it is not convenient to modify the external document and then import it again because it will not override the previous one with the document versioning. It means that even if there is an import feature it is not easy to repeatedly import the same document in a different session. The graphical design features provided are not very stable. I think that it would be a better choice if the artifacts could be implemented in HTML form and not embedded as an artifact.
  • Good feature of tracking artifacts with work items
  • Interesting graphics viewer for the mapping relationship
  • Interesting concept and technical solutions for the module
  • Versioning feautures of the artifacts revision
  • Transform the artifact in HTML in form template
  • Improve the import feature, because often it crashes the procedure
  • Improve the managing of the folder structure
I think that in cases where there is a skilled functional analyst team that is well trained in the use of the tools and completely dismisses the use of Word documents to collect the requirements, it is a good fit. It seems that a good solution to improve efficiency to collect the specification is to use the module. If you need to build more accurate artifacts containing even fields and not just free text this is not possible. It would be helpful to store the specific value in metadata, and it would be interesting to compile artifacts with predefined fields that could be queried.
Srivardhan Dingari | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The whole team uses IBM Rational Team Concert. The main focus is to write change requests which includes implementation work tickets, reviews etc.
  • Dead Lines are clearly assigned through change requests
  • Tracking the assignments (Implementation Work Tickets)
  • Process
  • GUI can be implemented much more efficiently with clarity. I personally feel the current IBM Rational Team Concert is little clumsy.
Return to navigation